Crypto Lending

Forward Industries used staked Solana as loan collateral to fund a $27.4M buyback

March 20, 2026
2 min
read
Forward Industries used staked Solana as loan collateral to fund a $27.4M buyback

What changed

Forward Industries used staked Solana from its treasury to finance a corporate share repurchase that trimmed its common shares outstanding by 7.4%. The company bought back 6 million shares for $27.4 million, funding the transaction with a $40M crypto-backed loan from Galaxy Digital secured by the staked SOL. A company transaction summary is detailed in reporting on the deal.

What the episode exposed

The mechanics are straightforward but revealing: a public company converted an illiquid, staking-positioned token holding into near-term cash via a bilateral crypto loan to effect a buyback authorized under a $1B board-approved program from November 2025. Forward holds more than 7M SOL in its treasury (currently valued at $614M in the reporting) and its equity has fallen more than 89% from last year’s peak—conditions that help explain the appetite for monetizing on-chain stakes to return capital to shareholders. The original coverage lays out the sequence of the loan and repurchase.

What this means for collateral operations

For credit and collateral teams, this episode crystallizes two linked points: first, crypto-backed lending can concentrate counterparty exposure in ways that traditional corporate credit often does not expect—here, a single lender underwrote a facility backed by treasury-held staked tokens; second, staked positions behave differently from free-floating tokens. Staked SOL can be economically large on a balance sheet yet subject to liquidity and protocol constraints that complicate collateral replacement or rapid deleveraging. Those facts matter for covenant design, haircut schedules and the pricing of any treasury-backed facility.

What this changed for collateral markets

Assetify judgment: this deal shows that corporate treasuries can—and will—use staked crypto holdings as direct collateral to fund buybacks, turning treasury asset composition into an active credit decision rather than a passive balance-sheet detail. That matters because it externalizes two risks for lenders and counterparties: concentrated counterparty exposure to the lending entity and potential liquidity friction if staked collateral cannot be redeployed quickly or if market moves deepen losses. Neither of those outcomes is proven by the transaction itself, but the structure makes them relevant considerations for pricing and operational guardrails going forward.

436
9